writing feedback
This blog is my attempt to make it easier to give feedback on my students' writing. Posts and links aim to help students understand my feedback and error-correction codes, and to respond to feedback appropriately. The ultimate aim is to make all of my students better at editing their own work, and at writing academic assignments in the future.
Sunday 24 February 2013
Punctuation resource
A nice resource for correcting errors related to punctuation is the Oxford Dictionaries Online. Click here for the ODO pages on punctuation.
Tuesday 7 August 2012
Correction colours
I like to use colour-coding in my feedback on students' writing. In a long
assignment of 1500 - 4000, it's likely that if I find an example of one type of
error in the first couple of pages, I'll find further examples throughout the
student's work. By highlighting text in different colours (or just
underlining text), I can indicate the type of problem to my students, and they
can correct it by themselves. For more details about error types and how to
correct them, click on the relevant labels in the right-hand column of this
blog.
Text highlighted in grey : Verb phrase (including tense, aspect, modal
verbs, and use of the passive)
Text highlighted in dark grey : Punctuation
Underlined
text :
Articles and Referents (including a/an, the, this, that, and issues related to
singular / plural nouns and countability)
Text highlighted in yellow: Vocabulary (including spelling, capitalization, word form, and collocation)
Text highlighted in green: Sentence structure (including relative clauses, parallel structure, word class, and missing subjects and verbs)
Text highlighted in yellow: Vocabulary (including spelling, capitalization, word form, and collocation)
Text highlighted in green: Sentence structure (including relative clauses, parallel structure, word class, and missing subjects and verbs)
Text highlighted in cyan : Pattern grammar. This is where
vocabulary meets grammar, so it’s about the pattern that a particular word
should be used in (e.g. I look forward to seeing you, not *I look forward of I
will see you)
Text highlighted in dark grey : Punctuation
Text highlighted in red : Mistakes that should be easy to correct (subject-verb agreement,
typos)
Text highlight in pink : Register (not appropriate for academic writing). Note that this includes use of sources (including referencing problems, possible plagiarism, and quoted text that could be paraphrased more effectively)
Text highlighted in brown :
inappropriate use of linkers
Colour-coded advice
I'm not expert enough in HTML and
blogging to be sure that this will work, but what I've tried to do in this post
is create some colour-coded advice on how to correct errors that have been
highlighted in your writing. If I've highlighted an error in yellow, for
example, the yellow boxes below will contain advice on how to fix the problem.
Click on an error type for advice
When an error is difficult to categorise
It might help you to understand some of the
terms I use in my feedback if you consider one or two examples which I find
difficult to categorise:
1: Is the problem here related to SENTENCE
STRUCTURE or PUNCTUATION?
The first two authors teach at Essex Business school, University of
Essex, UK, while the third works for Pantheon Ventures–Russell Private Equity,
They have written several articles about the analysis of UK IPO underpricing and
venture capitalists.
We could certainly
classify this as a SENTENCE STRUCTURE problem.
Some teachers and writers will call this a RUN-ON SENTENCE. To fix it, though, we just need to pay
attention to PUNCTUATION:
The first two authors teach at Essex Business school, University of
Essex, UK, while the third works for Pantheon Ventures–Russell Private Equity; they have
written several articles about the analysis of UK IPO underpricing and venture
capitalists.
Where possible, I
like to use the term that will enable the easiest correction of the problem, so
in this case I’d probably bring the student’s attention to PUNCTUATION.
2: Is the problem
here WORD CLASS or PATTERN GRAMMAR?
They have written several articles about analysis UK IPO underpricing and venture capitalists.
Again, it could be
either of these issues. With attention
to WORD CLASS, our correction becomes:
They have written several articles about analysing UK IPO underpricing
and venture capitalists.
PATTERN GRAMMAR
might lead us to:
They have written several articles about the analysis of UK IPO underpricing
and venture capitalists.
3: Is this an
example of a WORD CLASS or COLLOCATION problem?
an abundant of knowledge
What’s more
important? The fact that “abundant” is
an adjective and so should be corrected to the noun “abundance” or the fact
that “an abundance of knowledge” is a strange combination of nouns that a
reader might not understand. In this
case, I think we can arrive at a better correction via attention to COLLOCATION
(I would suggest “considerable knowledge”, an option listed in the Oxford
Collocations Dictionary).
4: Are these
examples of COLLOCATION or PATTERN GRAMMAR problems?
The results
describe that…
The results present
that…
Perhaps it's easiest just to say "both". Results don't "describe" or "present" anything, so the writer should find another combination. At the same time, DESCRIBE and PRESENT should be followed by a NOUN PHRASE, not THAT and then a Subject + Verb. The whole phrase needs to be rewritten!
Word Class and Word Form
I make a distinction between WORD CLASS and WORD FORM which might seem small at first, but has an important effect on how you might correct the error. Take the following example:
It is so highly concentrated that the liquidity of the HKD market is relative slower.
"Relative" is a problem of WORD CLASS. The writer has used an adjective, but they need an adverb. "Slower" is an adjective, and the writer needs an adjective, but it's not quite right for their purpose. The problem is WORD FORM. The adjective they need is "slow", not the comparative form "slower". This is like the difference between "bored" and "boring", both forms of the word are adjectives, but carry a different meaning. You're probably bored now, because this blog is boring.
Collocations Resources
I tend to
label a lot of vocabulary errors as issues of COLLOCATION. An
introduction to collocations will be included in the early stages of all the
courses I teach on, but my basic example is always that in English (an many
other languages, so I’m told), a combination like “ride a bicycle” is a good
collocation, and “drive a bicycle” is not.
In academic writing, I often find myself correcting “bad” collocations
like “make a research” (it should be something like DO or CONDUCT RESEARCH)
In order to correct COLLOCATION errors by yourself, here are some online resources for you to explore. Let me know if you have any questions about how to use / access any of the sites, and tell me also if you have any particular requests regarding online resources.
In order to correct COLLOCATION errors by yourself, here are some online resources for you to explore. Let me know if you have any questions about how to use / access any of the sites, and tell me also if you have any particular requests regarding online resources.
cambridge dictionaries online
longman online dictionary
macmillan online dictionary
oxford dictionary (and the less legal oxford collocations dictionaryhttp://5yiso.appspot.com/)
Corpora and Concordancers
collins concordance and collocations sampler
mark davies' british national corpus search
a huge but fairly anonymous concordancing site
Monday 6 August 2012
How to resolve problems of pattern grammar
International students often come to the UK after
years of studying English in their home country, and are surprised to be told
that they are not using words properly, especially when this relates to “easy”
words that they learned a long time ago.
I suspect that this is because they’ve learned words through translation
or as items on vocabulary lists. As a
result, there’s never been any emphasis on how to use words correctly. Given how common words like MAKE, MOST, and
ALMOST are, I am sometimes shocked at how few of my students can actually use
them in a sentence, despite the fact that they are just a month or two away
from starting postgraduate courses.
I use the term PATTERN GRAMMAR in my feedback to
highlight exactly this phenomenon. A
student has probably chosen an appropriate vocabulary item, but hasn’t used it
correctly. I like the term PATTERN
GRAMMAR because I think it encourages us to think of strings of words, and not
just words as individual items. If I
want to use the word AFRAID, for example, I need to know that I can either
write “I am afraid of heights”, “I am afraid of old men with big moustaches” (be
+ afraid + of + NOUN PHRASE) or “I am afraid to go there alone” (Be + afraid +
to + verb). I can even go with “I am
afraid that I cannot come to class today” (be + afraid + that + Subject +
Verb).
If you have an error highlighted as a problem of PATTERN GRAMMAR
(which may just be highlighted in yellow, for you to work out by yourself), you
can try to fix it by following this process:
2.
Look at the listed patterns of use for your
key word. Can you find the example that
best reflects your meaning?
3.
Compare YOUR pattern with the dictionary
example.
4.
Adapt your pattern so that it reflects what
the dictionary tells you.
There are some complications that might get in your way, so it’s
worth considering the following questions:
a)
Are you checking the right form of your key
word?
- sometimes errors occur because the pattern for
a noun, says, is not applicable to its corresponding verb. We say HAVE AN INFLUENCE ON, and HAVE AN
EFFECT ONN (both nouns, and both followed by noun phrases), but not *the USA
influences on the UK, or *tiredness affects on exam performance (no preposition
follows the verb: it should just be THE USE INFLUENCES THE UK, and TIREDNESS
AFFECTS EXAM PERFORMANCE)
b)
If your key word is a verb, is it TRANSITIVE
or INTRANSITIVE?
-
again, a good dictionary will tell you this
(often with an I or T next to the entry for a verb). A TRANSITIVE verb needs to be followed by an
object; an INTRANSITIVE does not take an object (which will also mean that it
can’t be used in the passive voice). This
should explain why *the researchers measured and *the crash was occurred
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)